Repetitio l. quo minus ff. de fluminibus edita per excellentissimum iurisconsultum doctor Iasonem de mayno mediolanensem in florentissimo ticinensi gymnasio salutis dominice Mcccclxxxxi die xx Octobris.
[Comment on the law begins.]
Incipit: ‘[Q]uo minus. Lecturus anno ...’
BB4v
Explicit: ‘... studium excitasse| FINIS’
[Author’s epilogue.]
De repetitione a preclarissimo iureconsulto domino Iasone Mayno super l. quo minus de fluminibus nuperrime absoluta Petri offrendi Cremonensis carmen.
[Petrus Offredus couplets on Jason de Mayno.]
Ut solidis graius struxit compagnib[u]s alnum| Insolitum tentans per mare Iason iter| Quo fera terrigene superaret prelia turme| ferret et aurate vellera victor ovis| Omnia sic celeri lustravit fl[u]mina puppi| Maynus et ad patriam iam remavit humum| Acta quid huc forsan portarit cymba requiris| Quicquid ab auriferis erruit indus aquis.| Quicquid et in patria dives fodit astur harena| Quicquid et in stavo littore rhenus habet| quod tagus et rapidis voluit pactolus in undis| Quod foelix lecta messe recundit arabs| hanc igitur studiose tarem pete libera cunctis| est via non merces claudit aura suas| Quilibet ex isto partem sibi sumat acervo| Mentis ut exornent hec monumenta domum.| Hinc titulis maynum decantet iasona summis.| Opter et hunc pylie vincere pensa colus| Nam proprio solers evellet senta ligone| Que sacri campo cesaris alta virent.
Colophon: ‘Impressum fuit hoc opus solemnis repetitionis l. quo minus ff. de fluminibus in alma et inclita civitate Papie per Michaelem et Bernardinuum fretres de garaldis Mcccclxxxxviiii Die xxi Novembris.’
Remarks: The digitalised copy used for the analisys stops at leaf BB⁴, but the last signed leaf is BB³. This leads to think that leaves BB⁵ and BB⁶ were blank and thus went missing. However, by analysing the other bibliographical records referenced in ISTC it seems that in all the copies recorded quire BB is a bifolium and not a ternus. Thus, the total amount of leaves is 10.
